Closed mhinsch closed 2 years ago
So I usually make use of ? may be there are more potentials in current code and I am fine with that.
I misunderstood you I am fine with if rather than ?
Will take little time before all ? are transformed to if
No worries, this is obviously low priority. Just maybe something to keep in mind.
I think the use of ?: as an if-replacement is getting out of hand. It's really easy to skip over these lines and if you are - like me - used to the C/C++ use of ?: it automatically registers as non-modifying. There are some cases where it's nicer to use (modifying) ?: than if, but especially if one of the branches is empty I would really prefer it if we could stick with the boring option.