Open drobbie429 opened 3 years ago
Hi Drobbie
Possibly what's happening is that clumping method/stage 1 is leading to lots of index SNPs that are not present in the outcome dataset. How many SNPs do you get after clumping method/stage 1 and how many of those are missing from the outcome dataset? Another possibility is that some SNPs are missing from the LD reference panel. Perhaps the overlap between the reference panel and the outcome study SNPs is greater.
Where to find pre-clumped lead SNPs of GTEx-V8? Thanks.
Hello,
I wanted to ask if you can advise on the following please.
I am performing a two sample MR within two cohorts. I have tried two methods to clump as both seem valid. 1) I clump the exposure first. 2) The other way I have tried is to find the genome-wide significant unclumped snps for the exposure that are present in the outcome cohorts and clump that set of SNPS. I get around 25 SNPs more using the second method. Can you advise why there’s quite a big discrepancy in the SNPs depending on which stage I clump and which may be the better way?
TIA