From Remi (to be done within the week once it is posted)

[LucieGueuning]

@anexact for ethnography! Feedback after using REACH

Looks like even basic information are not enough for an external viewer to understand (from what I saw)

No info on population moved outside the area, or any comments by the person monitoring. Like no need for MSF explo / intervention.

I think a viewer should get

We open the event for monitoring, then this is the info we have, then this is our view and decision on the evnt, then we stop monitoring .

I looked also at the borogan typhoon from december. Same, and status is still ongoing.

Then I think we should try to get people on the ground sending us info through the report system, just also to test in real life

And overall, all this should be capture in a testing plan like SOP, helping the users on how do we expect them to test.

I am sorry if I missed an event entered that is more complete, but this is my quick feedback.

[matthewberryman]

@LucieGueuning @anexact can you please revisit with operators as part of ethnography what fields are mandatory and when they are to be entered (creation and/or edit) to help address this.

[LucieGueuning]

field definition

event creation

event edition