Open Stortebecker opened 4 years ago
MS-GF+ constructs a dynamic programming grid of residues to consider when examining MS/MS spectra. This means it's not straightforward to adjust which peptides are to be considered or not considered for searching, given a set of dynamic mods. Thus, the only option you have available is to perform two searches, one with normal amino acids, and one with N15-labelled amino acids, which you can define using static mods:
StaticMod=0.997035, ADCEGILMFPSTYV, fix, any, Label:15N(1) # 15N Labeled ADCEGILMFPSTYV
StaticMod=1.994070, NQKW, fix, any, Label:15N(2) # 15N Labeled NQKW
StaticMod=2.991105, H, fix, any, Label:15N(3) # 15N Labeled H
StaticMod=3.988140, R, fix, any, Label:15N(4) # 15N Labeled R
See also this example file: MSGFPlus_N15_PartTryp_20ppmParTol.txt
Sorry for the late answer: That's the workaround I used so far. But of course it would be more convenient to have a combined results file directly.
Describe the question or problem I am working with metablic 15N labelling, meaning that every nitrogen in every amino acid of a protein is replaced by 15N. To search for these modifications, I would either have to use fixed searches for unlabelled and labelled proteins separately or use a high number of optional modifications, which would blow up the search space tremendously.
As all proteins are either fully unlabelled or fully labelled, I would need an option to search for a set of modifications, instead of searching for each modification separately.
Details The 15N labelling could be described by the following settings:
A possibility to search for sets of modifications has been implemented into X!Tandem.