Closed TnakaNY closed 6 years ago
I agree, the difference between mode 1 (Orbitrap) and mode 3 (Q-Exactive) is a bit nebulous. Likely the scoring model was trained with a different set of training data. ~Most likely the Q-Exactive scoring model was trained with high res MS1 / high res MS2 datasets. If your Fusion Lumos data is high/high, mode 3 is likely better. If it is high res MS1 / low res MS2 (using the ion trap), then mode 1 is better.~
Of course, it wouldn't hurt to try both modes with your data and see which gives more high confidence identifications.
Correction. I just looked at my automation code and it uses the following logic:
You can tell if the MS2 spectra are high res by looking for FTMS
in the scan filter, for example FTMS + p NSI
. Low res spectra have ITMS
in the scan filter. Thus, for your Fusion Lumos data use mode 1.
Hi, Thank you for your quick reply! I will change my instrumental code to 1 from 3.
Very best, TnakaNY
Hi,
I am going to analyze a data derived from Thermo Fusion Lumos by MSGF+.
In instrument code, MSGF+ has below; 0: Low-res LCQ/LTQ (Default), 1: Orbitrap/FTICR, 2: TOF, 3: Q-Exactive
Which code should I use for Fusion Lumos data?
Best, TnakaNY