Closed szpak closed 2 months ago
Agreed. I have my hands full these days with other projects, but I'm planning to add GitLab support in January. Unless you or someone else wants to contribute it.
I took a look at the code and GitHub part seems to be highly coupled with the rest. Probably bigger some refactoring with extracting the Git-provider related code is needed. It's your code, you know it very well and in my option you are the best person to do it properly.
Impatiently waiting for January :)
Jup, the coupling is making it more difficult to extend the code. I'm indeed planning to add an abstraction layer.
By the way, in case you have some free time and interest, you could research which SDK calls (using this Gitlab SDK) are equivalent to the githubkit SDK calls I'm making in the code. That would take a lot of work off my plate.
Looks like you switched from githubkit
to PyGitHub
recently:
So is this still relevant?
By the way, in case you have some free time and interest, you could research which SDK calls (using this Gitlab SDK) are equivalent to the githubkit SDK calls I'm making in the code. That would take a lot of work off my plate.
Yes, still relevant. The wording is now:
in case you have some free time and interest, you could research which SDK calls (using this Gitlab SDK) are equivalent to the PyGithub SDK calls I'm making in the code. That would take a lot of work off my plate.
It would be good to support also GitLab as a Git repository.