Looks like there was an effort for forward modelling in the Pek2dForward script in modeling. It has old program calls and needs updating to current programs in Occam2d. I am running 2d Occam inversions on my dataset but would like to use the same real geometry and acquisition parameters in a forward model. Do you have any suggestions on the direction to take for this workflow? Looking to create a best interpretation model to test sensitives of different anomalies and also checkerboards to look at general resolution.
Looks like there was an effort for forward modelling in the Pek2dForward script in modeling. It has old program calls and needs updating to current programs in Occam2d. I am running 2d Occam inversions on my dataset but would like to use the same real geometry and acquisition parameters in a forward model. Do you have any suggestions on the direction to take for this workflow? Looking to create a best interpretation model to test sensitives of different anomalies and also checkerboards to look at general resolution.
I used https://github.com/geoscixyz/geosci-labs/blob/main/geoscilabs/em/MT.py and MTPy to get 1D forward models. Much different to replicate the 2D geometry from the Occam inversions.
Thanks!