Open gavinfay opened 3 months ago
M for GB cod is 0.29, not 0.2
On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 2:13 PM Maria Cristina Perez < @.***> wrote:
@gavinfay https://github.com/gavinfay In the stock assessment report M was 0.2 for cod and 0.102 for dogfish so thats what I ma using for predators (M1) and small values of M1 for herring and mackerel (I started with 0.05 for both)
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/MaC-Perez/Hydra-self-testing/issues/13#issuecomment-2310785768, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB5X65HDGA5BEWDY2JCR7J3ZTNV4FAVCNFSM6AAAAABNAR3V3KVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGMJQG44DKNZWHA . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
--
Gavin Fay, Ph.D. Fisheries & Ecosystem management, Ecological modeling, Stock assessment @.*** @gavin_fay www.gavinfay.com
@gavinfay In the stock assessment report M was 0.29 for cod and 0.102 for dogfish so I started with low values until M was app 0.2 and 0.102 for predators and also close to 0.35 and 0.2 for herring and mackerel (all these values taken from stock assessment reports). fixed OF value of 23
M1+M2 plot
OK, but you need to show how you got here, not just the end result. We wanted to look at how M changed as a function of M1 and OF. As discussed, make sure you know what a OF value of 23 means? Is this plausible? It doesn't look like you have very much species interaction here (M for your prey species are only varying by ~0.001 over the time series) - likely because your other food is gigantic.
Fix values for M1 for cod and dogfish (case study predators) at the values used in current assessments for those stocks.