Thanks for developing this database and making it so freely available. The fact that all the raw files were uniformly processed and kallisto counts were directly shared is pretty awesome.
My issue is regarding the GEO accession: GSE57872 for homo sapiens. In GEO database, there are 800+ samples for this study and processed data is made available for 500+ after removal of low quality cells.
But in ARCHS4, only 80 odd samples are available from this study. May I know what filters/ criteria were used during the processing to reject the remaining cells?
I could not get this information from the ARCHS4 publication or from the codes shared here. (I tried to go through them as best as i could)
I hope this isn't something silly as no-one has raised this kind of issue before
Hello ARCHS4 team.
Thanks for developing this database and making it so freely available. The fact that all the raw files were uniformly processed and kallisto counts were directly shared is pretty awesome.
My issue is regarding the GEO accession: GSE57872 for homo sapiens. In GEO database, there are 800+ samples for this study and processed data is made available for 500+ after removal of low quality cells. But in ARCHS4, only 80 odd samples are available from this study. May I know what filters/ criteria were used during the processing to reject the remaining cells?
I could not get this information from the ARCHS4 publication or from the codes shared here. (I tried to go through them as best as i could) I hope this isn't something silly as no-one has raised this kind of issue before