search

MacPython / statsmodels-wheels

2 stars 12 forks source link

Consider unifying this repo with upstream #162

Open mattip opened 2 weeks ago

mattip commented 2 weeks ago

Since the migration to cibuildwheel, it would seem this repo could be merged with the upstream statsmodels. That would get more eyes on the wheel building, and would make it easier to manage things like the API secret by the project maintainers. Is there a reason to keep it separate here?

bashtage commented 2 weeks ago

We should probably just migrate it to the statsmodels org as a speerate repo. I agree there isn't much of a case to continue to use this org.

agriyakhetarpal commented 2 weeks ago

I fully agree with this, it took me a short while yesterday to find out where statsmodels was publishing its nightly wheels from! This repository is hidden in the nooks and crannies of a separate organisation :)

josef-pkt commented 2 weeks ago

numpy, scipy and pandas have already moved.

So, I don't see a reason to move statsmodels builds also.

@bashtage How should we do this? for example https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/creating-and-managing-repositories/transferring-a-repository#transferring-a-repository-owned-by-your-organization or just forking, or creating a separate repo

AFAIU, you have permission on both organizations to make a transfer.

agriyakhetarpal commented 2 weeks ago

It could also be moved and maintained as a standalone workflow in the main statsmodels repository, which would avoid the need for updating the submodule before building.