Mach5 / supersonic

Open-source web-based media streamer and jukebox fork of Subsonic. Supports MP3, OGG, AAC and other streamable audio and video formats. Runs on Windows, GNU/Linux and Mac using Java.
226 stars 61 forks source link

Project dead? #88

Open famewolf opened 11 years ago

famewolf commented 11 years ago

All files look to be about 9 months old...subsonic 4.8 has been out for months but supersonic is still on 4.7beta1....bugs filed even longer than 9 months such as it saying a new version exists but points you to the subsonic page instead of the supersonic one still exist and have not been fixed.

Is this project still being maintained?

sciurius commented 11 years ago

I'm afraid we have to assume it's dead. Or stuck, at least.

I think it would be better to have a set of patches that we can apply to subsonic, e.g. to remove the license checks.

sciurius commented 11 years ago

Okay, I worked out a very easy way how to do it just in case anyone is interested.

sciurius commented 11 years ago

subsonic-premium

wbrand commented 11 years ago

@sciurius , I'm very interested in your patch!

sciurius commented 11 years ago

wbrand notifications@github.com writes:

@sciurius , I'm very interested in your patch!

Drop me your email and I'll send the instructions.

-- Johan

wbrand commented 11 years ago

@sciurius, I've added my email to my profile. Drop me the info when you get a moment. Thanks!

philler3000 commented 11 years ago

@sciurius release your patch here - this is open source after all. this product is dead btw because it does not your hsqldb - simple as that

sciurius commented 11 years ago

Okay, here are instructions to eliminate SubSonic license checking. There are several ways to accomplish this, this is just one way to do it.

ssavinel commented 11 years ago

Well thank you ! I passed by your repo a few weeks ago and when I saw how old the file were, I was sad to see that the fork died. I came back to check for a last time and read your instructions on how to get a "real" free software. I have not tried it yet, but I will ASAP. Thank you again, I never had the courage to read the sources. =)

aijcoa commented 10 years ago

@sciurius Which version does that patch work with? I'm on 4.7 beta 2, and my directory structure looks nothing like that. I've got a SettingsService.class, but no SettingsService.java. I assume this is the "DRM' method that Subsonic uses to ensure users can't remove the license check. I'll keep working on it.

sciurius commented 10 years ago

f7n notifications@github.com writes:

Which version does that patch work with?

4.8

indikaPathi commented 10 years ago

Can this be used as a on demand streaming server? I am trying to decide between this(subsonic/supersonic) and flumotion. I would appreciate any feedback.

sciurius commented 10 years ago

indikaPath notifications@github.com writes:

Can this be used as a on demand streaming server? I am trying to decide between this(subsonic/supersonic) and flumotion. I would appreciate any feedback.

What precisely do you require from an "on demand straming server"?

lukas-buergi commented 8 years ago

Still works as of Subsonic 5.2.1. I suggest if you do this and get some real use out of Subsonic you donate something to the developer.

EugeneKay commented 8 years ago

I maintain a "Libre" distribution of the upstream Subsonic(without incorporating any of the changes in this or other forks) at EugeneKay/Subsonic that you may find to be of interest.

lukas-buergi commented 8 years ago

The developer wants to and deserves to be paid. If one is not able to pay, it was always possible to follow some directions and get it running, with some work needed as a kind of proof you really couldn't pay. But making it completely effortless like this just encourages people to use it without paying, even though they could. Of course it's legal - but in my opinion against good etiquette and doesn't follow a high ethics standard. Well. Whatever.

sciurius commented 8 years ago

My personal opinion: The developer has done a great job and deserves to be paid if he wants. I'd be happy to pay $10-20 for a perpetual license with no strings attached. However, I reject the license model that Subsonic uses. I do not want to pay a monthly license fee. I try to avoid software that performs license checks all of the time, for this means I can not use the software on a local network that is not connected to the internet. It also means that Mr. Subsonic can stop me from listening to my own music collection whenever he feels like, for whatever reason, or with no reason at all. When Subsonic goes out of business, our music silences. Subsonic is a decent product, but choose the wrong license model. FYI: I dropped Subsonic (and Supersonic) years ago in favour of the Logitech Media Server.

lukas-buergi commented 8 years ago

I guess you've got a point too, yes.