codecov-commenter
commented
1 year ago Codecov Report
Patch and project coverage have no change.
Comparison is base (
ec4169b) 52.57% compared to head (6704ea6) 52.57%.
:mega: This organization is not using Codecov’s GitHub App Integration. We recommend you install it so Codecov can continue to function properly for your repositories. Learn more
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #25 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 52.57% 52.57% ======================================= Files 9 9 Lines 1533 1533 ======================================= Hits 806 806 Misses 727 727 ``` | Flag | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | Linux | `52.57% <ø> (ø)` | | | Windows | `?` | | | cpu | `52.57% <ø> (ø)` | | | macOS | `52.57% <ø> (ø)` | | | pytest | `52.57% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=MachineLearningLifeScience#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more. Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us [how you rate us](https://about.codecov.io/nps?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=MachineLearningLifeScience). Have a feature suggestion? [Share it here.](https://app.codecov.io/gh/feedback/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=MachineLearningLifeScience):umbrella: View full report at Codecov.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.
While executing the `computing_geodesics' example notebook With torch version 1.13.1 I received a
which was easy to fix:
becomes
and the output remains the same.
In case you want this change in the main repo, here we go. If not, no hard feelings if you delete this PR.