Closed tknopp closed 1 year ago
Base: 64.23% // Head: 64.23% // No change to project coverage :thumbsup:
Coverage data is based on head (
011bd8a
) compared to base (dcf7799
). Patch has no changes to coverable lines.
:umbrella: View full report at Codecov.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.
Thanks for looping me in @tknopp. @mrikasper and I have spiral data available at https://zenodo.org/record/6510021#.Yxe_7y0r1QI and are just thinking about how to package it into a small, test-friendly example. I'l take a look at this branch and see what we need to do to make it work with our dataset.
For the unit tests we could alternatively simulate some ISMRMRD files with our internal simulation framework. This would be more flexible.
committed directly in https://github.com/MagneticResonanceImaging/MRIReco.jl/commit/2e29cb913061d53aa477b63203086fb7556c6573 since this had conflicts.
This is a first attempt to implement partial reading from ISMRMRD files (closes #76). What is still missing is the fix of the header. I do not yet have an idea how to do that. We probably want to allow just
UnitRanges
for the appliedslice
argument.@mrikasper @alexjaffray: I don't have data with multiple slices / repetitions at hand. Would be great if you could give this a test + help me fixing the header. The test should include timing. I expect that the sliced reading should be faster and acquire only the memory required for the slice. But I am only 90% sure about that.