A small and simple “drawing” program, with a clean and understandable code. You have some great considerations in your readMe, about GitHub and language, especially in your comparison with natural languages, but unfortunately, none of this really shows in your program. You also mention this yourself and call it unambitious, and I agree with that, but you still made good use of some different syntaxes, like if-sentence, displayWidth/Height, and mouseIsPressed.
It is generally a good thing to be ambitious with your concept, and try something, that doesn’t feel like the save choice. Maybe try in future exercises to imagine what you want to make before you start to program, and then through examples and the references get as close as you can to what you want, then it is okay to discuss in the readMe how you would have liked it differently, if you had trouble with implementing part of your concept.
It seems like the emphasis in your program has been on making code that is executable, and that results in a very precise code without any unnecessities. This makes good and readable code, but maybe not a very expressing program. This course is less about making nice clean code, and more about being able to express something with your code. I know we have just started, but this is just some food for thoughts moving forward.
Really good work with the considerations in the readMe and such a nice clean code 😉
A small and simple “drawing” program, with a clean and understandable code. You have some great considerations in your readMe, about GitHub and language, especially in your comparison with natural languages, but unfortunately, none of this really shows in your program. You also mention this yourself and call it unambitious, and I agree with that, but you still made good use of some different syntaxes, like if-sentence, displayWidth/Height, and mouseIsPressed. It is generally a good thing to be ambitious with your concept, and try something, that doesn’t feel like the save choice. Maybe try in future exercises to imagine what you want to make before you start to program, and then through examples and the references get as close as you can to what you want, then it is okay to discuss in the readMe how you would have liked it differently, if you had trouble with implementing part of your concept. It seems like the emphasis in your program has been on making code that is executable, and that results in a very precise code without any unnecessities. This makes good and readable code, but maybe not a very expressing program. This course is less about making nice clean code, and more about being able to express something with your code. I know we have just started, but this is just some food for thoughts moving forward.
Really good work with the considerations in the readMe and such a nice clean code 😉