Open aramirezreyes opened 3 years ago
This sounds fair to me, the only thing that might be helpful to have would be a little context or evidence that the color palette was indeed copied by Wong (instead of just taking the word of someone on GitHub).
That is reasonable.
One way to check that is the archive.org link from 2003 ( https://web.archive.org/web/20030821055411/http://jfly.iam.u-tokyo.ac.jp/color/text.html ). Wong´s nature paper was published in 2011 ( https://www.nature.com/articles/nmeth.1618 ).
Other nature methods paper recognizes the precedence of Okabe and Ito's paper: "Wong in a subsequent article on graphics design accounting for those with color vision deficiencies suggests using, for additive color images (typically two-channel confocal images), the method proposed by Okabe and Ito (http://jfly.iam.u-tokyo.ac.jp/color/)."
As well as other sites on the topic, e.g. https://yoshke.org/blog/essays/2020/07/colorblind-friendly-diagrams/
Hi! I was doing some reading about colorblind-friendly color schemes and saw that Makie has a group called "Wong colors" https://github.com/JuliaPlots/Makie.jl/blob/ef544356409565801e8f37b7118a0146de0f7262/src/theming.jl#L35.
However in https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/issues/9460#issuecomment-817207007 I've discovered that said color pallete was published in Nature by Wong without attribution to its original authors Masataka Okabe & Kei Ito. (https://jfly.uni-koeln.de/color/#assign)
It sounds like the sensible thing to do is to attribute the original authors. Would this be a welcomed suggestion?
Thanks