Closed higham closed 10 years ago
latex/next-section
should indeed move point when point is on a section command. If that's not happening for you then it seems we've got a bug.
Unfortunately, I can't reproduce that here. If I have the following buffer:
\subsection{Bar}
Some text
\subsubsection{Foo}
I place point right on top of the first \
, and I invoke latex/next-section
, then the point moves right to the second \
.
Is that not heppening for you?
If so, could you let me know which version you're running?
When I try your example the cursor doesn't move, but I see "Mark set" in the minibuffer.
I'm running
GNU Emacs 24.3.1 (i386-mingw-nt6.1.7601) of 2013-03-16 on USER-PC
Precompiled AUCTeX for Emacs auctex-11.87-e24.2-msw.zip (signature) from http://www.gnu.org/software/auctex/download-for-windows.html
and am using reftex as well.
I do have a heavily customized .emacs and I haven't yet tried a stripped down version.
BTW, C-c C-q is predefined as a prefix in Auctex:
C-c C-q C-e LaTeX-fill-environment C-c C-q C-p LaTeX-fill-paragraph C-c C-q C-r LaTeX-fill-region C-c C-q C-s LaTeX-fill-section
so I've switched to (define-key LaTeX-mode-map (kbd "C-c C-q C-q") 'latex/clean-fill-indent-environment)
Ok, I've spotted the bug. And it was really stupid of me for not noticing this earlier.
Thanks for reporting this.
Ok, I think I fixed it now. It's not on the master branch yet because I want to test it for a day before releasing. If you'd like to download it, it's on the dev branch.
A quick test indicates the problem is fixed. Thanks for the quick response.
By the way, I implemented a variable to disable the C-c C-q
mapping, so you don't have to manually edit the file.
The variable is called latex/override-fill-map
.
You can check out it's documentation for some comments on why it's enabled by default.
Very nice package.
latex/next-section does not move the point when point is on a section command. So issuing the command a second time does not move point. On the other hand latex/previous-section keeps moving back a section each time it is issued. Thus latex/next-section and latex/previous-section are not inverses of each other.
Can next-section be modified to move repeatedly to the next section with each successive invocation?