Closed lpichler closed 5 years ago
Also swift :)
@roliveri Can you comment on this?
As far as I know, they both should still be supported. What makes you believe they are not? Is this just from a "datastore" point of view - storage where VM files reside? Because Cinder and Swift storage objects are still collected.
@jerryk55 @hsong-rh Do we put anything in the storages table?
I don't believe we do. I think this is just datastores. Regardless I'm not sure why we would be removing these.
Ok, maybe there's been some confusion here..
"ontap" was supposed to be removed, right? ("ontap_storage_system", "ontap_logical_disk", "cim_base_storage_extent", "ontap_storage_volume", "ontap_file_share", "snia_local_file_system")
I don't really understand the relationship between the two, but after that, it looked like EmsSwift, EmsCinder and EmsStorage are dead code, which led to https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq-ui-classic/pull/2988. (Turns out, EmsStorage was not dead so that part got reverted later.)
But.. if EmsCinder and EmsSwift are not supposed to be dead, where in the UI should we be seeing those?
Yes "ontap" should be nuked. I'm not sure why EmsSwift and EmsCinder are dead. I'll take a look...
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not been updated for at least 6 months.
If you can still reproduce this issue on the current release or on master
, please reply with all of the information you have about it in order to keep the issue open.
Thank you for all your contributions!
@jerryk55 is this still a valid issue? If yes, please remove the stale label. If not can you close. If there's no update by next week, I'll be closing this issue.
Closing issue. If you feel the issue needs to remain open, please either reopen or let me know and it will be reopened. @miq-bot close_issue
Based on discussing with @himdel and @hstastna we found that support for
Storage
object withstore_type = CINDER
has been removed.So we need to remove such objects from DB with migration.
I believe that query to determine
what to remove
isStorage.where(:store_type => 'CINDER')
@himdel is it enough ?Links
After discussion in https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq-ui-classic/issues/3742
UI related issue: https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq-ui-classic/issues/3743
Screenshot
(highlighted is object to remove for example)