Hi,
I ran the evaluation/evaluate_mobilenet_ssd.py script with the ported caffe weights (converted_model.h5), but do not get the same performance on Pascal VOC 2007 test set as listed in the README. Instead of mAP = 0.72, I am getting only 0.60. Here is the output:
The only changes I made to the code were compatibility changes (e.g. K.image_dim_ordering() == 'tf' to K.image_data_format() == 'channels_last'), or print ... to print ( ... ), and fixing a few import statements
I am using tensorflow 1.13.1 and keras 2.3.0, python 3.5.4.
Note: after some experimentation I found that I can increase the mAP from 0.60 to 0.63 by setting steps=None to use automatic anchor box spacing. But I still cannot reach 0.72.
Do you know the source of the discrepancy between these values and the published mAP of 0.72?
Hi, I ran the evaluation/evaluate_mobilenet_ssd.py script with the ported caffe weights (converted_model.h5), but do not get the same performance on Pascal VOC 2007 test set as listed in the README. Instead of mAP = 0.72, I am getting only 0.60. Here is the output:
The only changes I made to the code were compatibility changes (e.g. K.image_dim_ordering() == 'tf' to K.image_data_format() == 'channels_last'), or print ... to print ( ... ), and fixing a few import statements I am using tensorflow 1.13.1 and keras 2.3.0, python 3.5.4.
Note: after some experimentation I found that I can increase the mAP from 0.60 to 0.63 by setting steps=None to use automatic anchor box spacing. But I still cannot reach 0.72. Do you know the source of the discrepancy between these values and the published mAP of 0.72?
Thanks!