ManojNimbalkar / bitcoin-wallet

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/bitcoin-wallet
0 stars 0 forks source link

unexpected sent amount... #71

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. send Bitcoins to a non-local address

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
I sent 0.25 BTC to another user.  In the transaction history, it displays 
--1.9095 instead of the expected withdraw of -0.25 from my wallet.  I 
understand this is the amount it returned to me from a larger chunk of coin, 
but this isn't the part of the transaction I'm interested in.  I expected this 
to display the amount sent -0.25 instead.

What version of Bitcoin Wallet are you using? On what Android version and
what phone? Don't just state 'most recent', this is not enough info.
This was from client version 1.46? (sorry, updated since then, was current at 
the time of transaction 12/15/11) and still shows this odd amount currently on 
version 1.48.  Cyanogenmod 7.1.

If you have problems with particular transactions, what is your Bitcoin
address? If you happen to have transaction IDs, please state them as well.

Please provide any additional information below.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by Droid7...@gmail.com on 25 Dec 2011 at 4:56

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Can you provide the public address this transaction was sent from? Or the 
transaction hash?

Original comment by andreas....@gmail.com on 30 Dec 2011 at 6:46

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
This is the transaction in question here:
http://blockexplorer.com/tx/1af90baf73793a1f4412046c1d558e9d311efea508360b90a724
53498b7f8b61#o0

Original comment by Droid7...@gmail.com on 31 Dec 2011 at 12:48

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Thanks. So it does display two minus signs? Is there a little space between 
these signs, like "- -1.9095"?

I can already confirm that for some reason, it displays your change from that 
transaction, rather than the spent amount.

Original comment by andreas....@gmail.com on 31 Dec 2011 at 12:59

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Did you ever add any Bitcoin addresses to your Bitcoin Wallet, in addition to 
the first one that is automatically created? Can you list all the public 
addresses (first 6 chars per address is sufficient) that are contained in your 
Bitcoin Wallet. Touch your address in the main screen to get a list of them.

Original comment by andreas....@gmail.com on 31 Dec 2011 at 1:16

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Hmmm.  Hard to tell if there is a space between the minus signs or not.  There 
is a gap there, but it isn't obviously a space.  I don't see any way to copy 
this text to the clipboard to judge elsewhere, so I'd be guessing if I said, 
either way.  (My guess is: no.)

I did.  They are:
1CuTMU-
1BxwvN-
1LFmsP-

Original comment by Droid7...@gmail.com on 31 Dec 2011 at 3:34

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
FYI this is also tracked on BitCoinJ bug

http://code.google.com/p/bitcoinj/issues/detail?id=144

Original comment by andreas....@gmail.com on 29 Feb 2012 at 3:19

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
We think that your wallet file has been corrupted by an earlier Bitcoin Wallet 
version. Can you make sure you have upgraded to version 1.52+ and then reset 
your blockchain? Options -> About -> Reset Blockchain

Original comment by andreas....@gmail.com on 2 Mar 2012 at 1:37

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Before resetting the block chain, I spent another sum and it reported the 
amount returned instead of the spent amount.  It showed the transaction as a 
debit rather than a deposit as the originally reported transaction had.  The 
newer transaction only had a single "-" in front of it.

Resetting the block chain fixed both transactions for me.  All are appearing 
correctly now.  Confirming this is fixed for me.  Thanks for your help.

Original comment by Droid7...@gmail.com on 7 Mar 2012 at 2:06

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Thanks for your update on this issue.

Original comment by andreas....@gmail.com on 9 Mar 2012 at 10:49