Open tbonfort opened 12 years ago
Author: tomkralidis Date: 2005/03/18 - 15:10
Any update on this one? We should fix this sooner than later.
Author: dmorissette Date: 2005/03/22 - 18:10
Um, that's a tough one: if we modify the OGR-GML driver to strip off the
namespace prefix then some people may see this as a bug. And OTOH I'm not sure
it's a good idea to systematically modify attribute names in the GML generation
code.
Oh wait, maybe a solution for you would be to use the attribute name mapping
that Steve just added in the GML code, see bug 950.
I'll mark this as WONTFIX, reopen if the attribute name mapping doesn't solve
the issue.
Author: tomkralidis Date: 2005/03/23 - 19:14
I'm not sure this would be a bug if implemented. The OGR GML driver currently
does not prefix the GML geometry objects (like gml:Point), so why should it
prefix the GML attributes?
Author: fwarmerdam Date: 2005/03/23 - 19:28
Tom,
In some feature types the prefixes from different names spaces are all
that is available to disambiguate what would otherwise be conflicting
names. For instance some features my have a gml:Description and a
feature class specific Description.
Nevertheless, I am of two minds on this. I am tempted to just strip all
namespaces from attributes like I do for the rest of the geometry stuff.
But I am afraid I may be creating problems for the future.
Reporter: tomkralidis Date: 2004/12/21 - 23:09