Closed tbonfort closed 12 years ago
Author: dmorissette Date: 2002/05/22 - 15:05
craig.gould wrote:
>
> Daniel
> Here are some simple comparative figures between 3.51 and 3.6 for zooming in
> on a map several times until the maximum zoom is reached (zoomsize=2).
>
> 3.6 3.51
> ------- --------
> 0.929 0.781
> 1 0.492
> 3.76 0.992
> 1.97 0.64
> 1.35 0.48
> 1.019 0.672
> 0.530 0.422
> 4.59 2.746 'Zoom reaches a new 10MB file
> 1.519 0.629
> 0.793 0.461
> 1.059 0.871
> 5.629 3.84 'Zoom reaches a new 70MB file
> 1.44 0.969
> 1.109 0.852
>
> As you can see 3.51 is faster in every single case.
> Unfortunately I cannot send you the data files as they belong to my
> employer.
> They are all TAB files, ranging from 20k to 70MB in size.
> The scale of the numbers is similar for searching, zooming out and panning.
>
> Craig.
>
Author: dmorissette Date: 2002/05/22 - 16:11
Note that teh 3.51 version that Craig was using was the Win32 nightly build from
the UMN website dated Feb 6th 2002
Author: dmorissette Date: 2002/05/22 - 16:34
Assigned to Julien.
Other notes: Craig's mapfile uses only straight TAB files (no seamless or
TABViews), most layers use STYLEITEM AUTO, and there is no reprojection going
on.
Author: dmorissette Date: 2002/06/19 - 19:47
See bug 162 which has been filed about the same problem...
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 162 ***
Reporter: dmorissette Date: 2002/05/22 - 15:04