Review - how to improve awesome-automotive ?

[Marcin214]

I'm wondering what else we could do with the awesome-automotive list: :ballot_box_with_check: Do you have any idea how to improve it ? :ballot_box_with_check: Shall we add another section ? :ballot_box_with_check: Is it current content ok ? :ballot_box_with_check: Is readability and navigation good ?

I'm open for ideas. Let's leave a comment ! Or maybe there's no need to do anything more. That's a valid comment too.

[dalathegreat]

Should we add a section on reverse-engineering communication?

[deepakrajpurushothaman]

May be a section about Field operation test, And another section Electric Vehicle. There are lot of universities going open source. Maybe a list of Institutes or labs on Github. For example TUM has its own profile where all their research area and some of the course exercise are on Github

[Deejuha]

First of all, great job doing this repo!

Just leaving some more or less valid ideas:

• The best way to get more information about some technical items in automotive are the ISO norms, how about adding the ISO norms numbers?
• New debugger used in Automotive: PLS (shall I make PR?)
• New Unit Test framework: Unity and CMock (shall I make PR?)
• (OK, this one could be an overhead) When the amount of information grows, the readability of single *.md file is lesser. It would be nice to slice the information into smaller parts, maybe attach some search engine. Sphinx framework offers static website generation using markdown-like files. On the other hand, github offers free static web hosting.
  • Next step could be adding a glossary that would be helpful if you're new in some topic.
  • Next step could be to harmonize the items with section like 1st-step e.g. if you don't know anything about some topic, you can read 1st-step section who describes in 1-2 sentences what the item means and information where to head to for more.