Open MarcusTXK opened 3 years ago
1) This is purely cosmetic
2) WRT the sequence diagram, while in most cases we would agree, for these two the process is already explained in detail before the diagram. All the parts in the diagram are 'essential details' as it is intended to be a low-level illustration of the way the command works; splitting the diagram into 2 will obstruct the meaning even more. (As you can see, it is a single command)
Team chose [severity.VeryLow
]
Originally [severity.Low
]
Reason for disagreement: ### Reasons for disagreeing with team's response
Example of me trying to read the sequence diagram after zooming in till the text in the sequence diagram roughly matches the original font size of the rest of the DG text:
Expected:
Actual:
More examples: