Closed MargaretSiple-NOAA closed 9 months ago
I have edited all of these except a couple of small things we need to address in the Methods: Sampling density at each of the depth ranges, and something about IPHC sampling protocol. Re: the IPHC stuff, I don't know how much detail we want to include in the report; we may need to consult with Ned on that one.
Since it's the one remaining thing I think we need to add, I'm going to just tag @Ned-Laman-NOAA here-- Ned, would you mind looking at this text and letting me know if this is a sufficient description of the IPHC sampling? This is non-urgent but we'll need it eventually for the text.
I'll work on this on and off over the next couple days and let you know when I've gotten through to the end.
Ned, you've done too much! I mean... I appreciate all the edits. But I mostly wanted you to look at the description of halibut sampling. I'll incorporate your other edits but the text is based on the AI methods, which you reviewed extensively before. So I don't expect you to do a full review again unless you're really jazzed about it.
OK. I misunderstood. This text is for the Gulf, right, so that it needs to be updated from the Aleutian flavor? Or did I misunderstand that too?
Yes, sorry I was vague about that. This text is indeed for the Gulf. It looks Aleutian-y in parts because a lot of it is copied from the AI report (as that was text that was heavily edited and reviewed).
OK. Here's my plan. I will continue through the Methods and look for places where we're talking about Aleutians and it needs to be shifted to the Gulf flavor. I will do my best to resist my urge to re-write things that don't need re-writing and limit my comments to those things where I need clarification. My goal is to complete my review by the end of this week, but I'll be sure to let you know when I've made it through whenever that is.
Great, that works well-- thank you!
Take a break Megsie! It's a holiday today.
On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 11:40 AM Margaret Siple @.***> wrote:
Closed #41 https://github.com/MargaretSiple-NOAA/goa-ai-data-reports/issues/41 as completed.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/MargaretSiple-NOAA/goa-ai-data-reports/issues/41#event-10928931917, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEGOPDGTT2GXQJCAWFB7EE3YDZ7JLAVCNFSM6AAAAAA4FHSCKWVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV45UABCJFZXG5LFIV3GK3TUJZXXI2LGNFRWC5DJN5XDWMJQHEZDQOJTGE4TCNY . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: <MargaretSiple-NOAA/goa-ai-data-reports/issue/41/issue_event/10928931917@ github.com>
-- Paul G von Szalay, MSc. Research Fishery Biologist Alaska Fisheries Science Center, NOAA Fisheries 7600 Sand Point Way, NE Seattle, WA 98115 206-526-4153 @.***
@vszalay I know! I swear I'm going to go to see my nephew and relax in like...10 mins.
Both of you-get your holiday on!
Need to update the text files contained in the MainText Google Drive folder here. These files contain text that was copied from existing GOA data reports. However, the AI report shares much of the intro material and I would like the GOA material to look similar.
I recommend artfully copying and pasting from the AI text files, which have already been reviewed and edited several times.
Obviously there are some location-specific things that we'll need to keep specific to GOA. But methods for carrying out the survey, etc, will be similar. R components (purple text in the docs) should keep the same names. Results template should also be similar. Assigning Alex because Ned says you're on the "writing team."
Sections that need to be updated: