Closed LTLA closed 8 years ago
For the mESC data set, running:
cor <- duplicateCorrelation(v.all, design, block=paste0(targets$Batch,targets$Serum))
... yields a cor$consensus
of ~0.27. Which is not huge, but it's definitely substantial, and it indicates that more than a quarter of the total variance in the experiment is attributable to the plate effect. This is comparable to the simulation setup in the paper; the variance in log-counts with a dispersion of 1 is around 1.6, and the variance of the log-plate effect is around 0.5.
Rejigged the simulations based on an estimated variance, so we don't need this anymore.
We can put in the consensus correlation from
duplicateCorrelation
from the real data, to show that the plate effect actually exists and contributes to the total variance of the experiment.