Small correction on Op.10 No.1

[napulen]

In mm.147 of Beethoven Op.10 No.1

Tonal context is f. The current annotation is Db major triad (VI), but the harmony is a D diminished triad (or half-diminished seventh).

Given the modulation on the next measure, iio/v should would work. I think C makes sense as chord tone, thus iiø7/v, but iio/v seems good as well.

[napulen]

Another small correction. I think the change of key in the development was intended to be done at mm106 and not mm109

[MarkGotham]

Thanks for this!

I've checked this out and (for reference) the key change is indeed missing in the original dataset, so the I is just a continuation to support the inclusion of a a form label at the moment. In short, we do need your correction of that original.

Second, I've taken to keeping a record of all such divergences from Chen+Su by putting a note in the line below and/or keeping a separate copy of their analysis (when the analyses get very different, it's time to start a new file).

Finally, for the harmonies in this passage, I agree we could improve the reading and have just put in a commit of my own on top of this one with to capture the shape of the sequence with a few pivot chords. That's a change of reading, and so enough for a new file. I've take the liberty of also putting your name in as analyst - I hope you agree. :)

[napulen]

I completely forgot about checking the original Chen+Su annotation, I was just staring at the score at that moment. Thank you for keeping track of this!

Thank you for adding me as an analyst :).