Cadenza in or out? K398

[napulen]

Facing a dilemma with K398. The "micchi" score doesn't feature the long cadenza, the TAVERN one does. The annotation seems to include annotations for the entire cadenza. Technically, it can be included.

The misalignment on the TAVERN score is much greater than the "micchi" one, so more work for including the cadenza, and more risk because of crazy time signature changes (33/8, 27/8, 16/4, and on and on).

I personally don't think that much is to gain from the cadenza, and much is to lose if anything goes wrong in the parsing/conversion of those weird measures. I would leave it out and jump straight into the next section. That means that the time people spent annotating those harmonies within the cadenza are discarded. About 30 annotations.

Thoughts?

[napulen]

More concretely, removing the cadenza means we jump from m155 to m167. (i.e., m167 becomes m156).

Form: Variation 6 b

m152 b1 I b2 I6 b3 V
m153 b1 I b2 I6 b3 V
m154 b1 I b1.5 V42/IV b2 IV b2.5 V b3 V7/vi
m155 b1 IV b1.5 viio6 b2 I6 b2.5 viio65/ii b3 ii6 b3.5 viio7/V

Time Signature: 39/8
Note: difficulties with cadenza measures. Alignment difficult from here to the end.

m156 b1 I64 b7 I64 b13 I64 b19 I64

Time Signature: 33/8

m157 b1 I64 b3.67 I64 b6.33 I64 b9 I64 b11.67 viio7/V

Time Signature: 27/8

m158 b1 viio7/V b1.33 viio7/V b2 viio7/V b4.67 viio7/V b7.33 viio7/V

Time Signature: 16/4

m159 b1 viio7 b5 viio7 b9 I6 b10.5 V65/IV b11 IV b12.5 V65/IV b13 IV b14.5 V65/IV b15 IV b15.5 V65/IV b16 IV b16.5 V65/IV

Time Signature: 7/4

m160 b1 IV b2 ii65 b6 I64

Time Signature: 21/4

m161 b1 I64 b5 I64 b9 I64 b11 I64 b15 I64

Time Signature: 9/8

m162 b1 ii b1.33 ii

Time Signature: 4/2

m163 b1 V7 b2 V7

Time Signature: 3/8

m164 b1 V7

Time Signature: 2/1

m165 b1 V7 b2 V7 ||

Form: Variation 6 d

Time Signature: 3/4

m167 b1 I b2 I6 b3 V
m168 b1 I b2 I6 b3 V
m169 b1 I b2 ii65 b3 V7
m170 b1 vi
m171 b1 I b2 I6 b3 V
m172 b1 I b2 I6 b3 V
m173 b1 I6 b2 ii6 b3 V7
m174 b1 I
m175 b1 vi b2 ii6 b3 V7
m176 b1 I
m177 b1 vi b2 ii6 b3 V
m178 b1 I
m179 b1 vi b2 ii6 b3 V
m180 b1 V7/IV
m181 b1 IV64 b2 I
m182 b1 I b2 ii42 b3 I
m183 b1 V7
m184 b1 I
m185 b1 I

[napulen]

By the way, I removed the cadenza in the TAVERN PR. It was too much work and I couldn't get it to work. After going through the actual music notation of the cadenza, I am not convinced that it's worth all the pain/risk of alignment that it takes. I'd rather secure the annotations of the rest of the piece. If you think this is a mistake, we can go back to the previous version of these analysis files and correct the score accordingly for alignment.

[napulen]

This was integrated with the TAVERN PR. No cadenza now.