Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
Original comment by karsten....@googlemail.com
on 25 Nov 2011 at 11:39
Attachments:
Original comment by de.abg.r...@gmail.com
on 27 Nov 2011 at 8:22
see also
http://groups.google.com/group/spray-dev/browse_thread/thread/fee6a584d9b51374
things to do:
* create extra branch (in future own repository) to hold the P2 repository project containing own the 3rd library dependencies
* introduce new parent pom for P2 repository project and old parent pom
* switch old parent pom to use build P2 repository from Jenkins build job artifact URL
* introduce Maven profiles to be able switch between remote P2 repository and local P2 repository (to be able to work off-line locally)
* investigate means how to configure Git and/or Jenkins to build only the changed Maven projects and their dependent projects (and when found the means apply them)
* update documentation if necessary
Original comment by de.abg.r...@gmail.com
on 27 Nov 2011 at 8:32
* spray-ci-targetplatform: takes 32 minutes, runs midnight and only then when there are changes in the target platform
* spray-ci-build: takes 14 minutes, runs when there are changes in the plug-in projects, checks this every 45 minutes
* spray-docs-build: takes 5 minutes, runs midnight and only then when there are changes in the docs projects
* spray-assembly-build: takes 25 minutes, runs midnight and only then when there are changes
For more details to the build jobs the this message:
http://groups.google.com/group/spray-dev/browse_thread/thread/481cee877019fb28
Original comment by de.abg.r...@gmail.com
on 13 Apr 2012 at 9:39
Good job!
How did you configure that builds are only triggered on changes to specific
subpaths in the repository?
Original comment by karsten....@googlemail.com
on 16 Apr 2012 at 8:53
I did not configure that yet, but it is possible - see the attached screenshot.
Original comment by de.abg.r...@gmail.com
on 16 Apr 2012 at 11:38
Attachments:
Will you configure this later?
Original comment by karsten....@googlemail.com
on 16 Apr 2012 at 11:40
Yes, this would be reasonable.
Original comment by de.abg.r...@gmail.com
on 16 Apr 2012 at 11:45
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
karsten....@googlemail.com
on 25 Nov 2011 at 11:34