In fact, it is similar to issue "the wrong result of the fog\u simulation.py using the Kitti data. \7". I directly run the "fog_simulation.py" file on Kitti and waymo datasets. The results are similar to issue 7. It seems that almost all points are regarded as fog noise.
I want to know whether it needs to be modified due to the intensity of the data or whether it is impossible to directly run fog_ simulation. Instead, I need to run pointcloud_viewer.py (doesn't sound reasonable)
Thank you for your excellent work.
In fact, it is similar to issue "the wrong result of the fog\u simulation.py using the Kitti data. \7". I directly run the "fog_simulation.py" file on Kitti and waymo datasets. The results are similar to issue 7. It seems that almost all points are regarded as fog noise.
I want to know whether it needs to be modified due to the intensity of the data or whether it is impossible to directly run fog_ simulation. Instead, I need to run pointcloud_viewer.py (doesn't sound reasonable)
Looking forward to your reply