a) Before posting your issue you MUST answer to the questions otherwise it
will be rejected (invalid status) by us
b) Please check the issue tacker to avoid duplication
c) Please provide network capture (Wireshark) or Javascript console log
if you want quick response
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1.Webrtc users B1,B2(browsers)
2.B1 is in office network and B2 connected though VPN
3.B1 makes video call to B2
4.After the call is established successfully
B1 and B2 pressing the hold button simultaneously
B2 is recieving 491 Another INVITE in progress and getting the message failed
on hold
5.From the originating side it is sending the INVITE with sendonly .B2 is
giving the 200 OK response with recv only
6.When again the Originator is sending the INVITE for resume B2 is sending the
200 OK with recv only parameter in the SDP instead of send-recv
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
B2 should send in the 200 OK with send-recv in sdp.
How can we avoid this race condition for hold/resume.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by chaudhar...@gmail.com on 28 Oct 2014 at 11:46
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
chaudhar...@gmail.com
on 28 Oct 2014 at 11:46