Closed tsufz closed 3 years ago
related to #94 @meier-rene is currently converting the currently implemented markup to JSON markup. Afterwards we should be datasetsearch-compliant.
@meier-rene, I found one final issue and then we could close this because @egonw confirmed compliance some days ago.
In the database schema is the description tag missing. We have it only in the html header section but not in the json representation.
@AlasdairGray and I were in an ELIXIR hackathon this week and he commented that on the records it should better be DataRecord
than Dataset
, see https://bioschemas.org/profiles/DataRecord/0.2-DRAFT-2019_06_14/ and then the mainEntity
field can point to the MolecularEntity
info.
@egonw Was there an progress with with DataRecord draft?
The DataRecord type has ended up causing more challenges than benefits. There is a proposal to remove DataRecord from the set of Bioschemas proposed types.
@AlasdairGray, thanks for the comment. Hence, we go ahead with the Dataset
object and additional the MolecularEntity
. I enhanced the Dataset
object already with the new tag measurementTechnique
. So we are ahead of time :-). For example: https://massbank.eu/MassBank/RecordDisplay?id=AU248503. We lack the creator tag, but this needs a rethinking of the author tag
in MassBank from scratch (see #194).
Best, Tobias
Google started the structured dataset search now. It needs a json set in the page headers.
https://developers.google.com/search/docs/data-types/dataset
https://toolbox.google.com/datasetsearch
We may consider to enhance MassBank with this information?