Closed meier-rene closed 4 years ago
... this is all fair enough and understandable (and hopefully achievable?), semantically I am not a fan of mzdraft
and would be keen to know what we could do to earn the mzspec
upgrade from PSI ASAP ... does anyone know how to do this?
Done
We got this information: Letting you all know, Wout and I had a few conversations with the Proteomics USI team about identifiers that would conform in style to proteomics spectral libraries. There are basically 3 changes that we'd need to do that would simply require in most cases an few characters on your side. These are basically made to support versioning of spectra if that were the case (though likely we wouldn't have it on the GNPS side but would be consistent with Proteomics libraries).
These are the changes that would happen for libraries
mzspec:MASSBANK:SM858102 -> mzdraft:MASSBANK::accession:SM858102 mzspec:MOTIFDB:motif:171163 -> mzdraft:MOTIFDB::accession:171163
For our own analysis tasks
mzspec:MS2LDATASK-38:document:43062 -> mzdraft:MS2LDA:TASK- 190:accession:43062 mzspec:GNPSTASK- c95481f0c53d42e78a61bf899e9f9adb:spectra/specs_ms.mgf:scan:1943 -> mzdraft:GNPS:TASK-c95481f0c53d42e78a61bf899e9f9adb- spectra/specs_ms.mgf:scan:1943
Wout and I have already updated the metabolomics USI website to handle these new styles, but have not merged/deployed.
What we need from you:
Once we have all these in place along, we will switch everything over on the resolution side to make sure we have minimal downtime.
I was hoping we'd aim for 2 weeks from now to make the change. Let me know if that works for you all!