Open meowcat opened 3 years ago
Those precursors look like a combination of all possible precursors falling into the isolation window. Just imagine what that would look like in the case of SWATH ...
So mzML has specified in http://www.peptideatlas.org/tmp/mzML1.1.0.html#precursorList
that there is either one isolation window, or selectedIonList
of multiple ions (i.e. as above).
We could request (and most submitters interpretetd it that way) that the MassBank record knows which ion resulted in the spectrum. Especially for known compounds. In that case the numeric precursor information makes sense. Yours, Steffen
In the current database scheme, the
msms_spectrum
view containsprecursor_mz_text
. However, the view can't be cached because of subselects, and the precursor is in text format. To rapidly select viable candidates via SQL (see https://github.com/rformassspectrometry/MsBackendMassbank/issues/28) I am proposing this one:The exclusion criteria are what is currently needed to get rid of records that don't cast properly, like MS3 cases and two very strange ones that list many values
https://massbank.eu/MassBank/RecordDisplay?id=PT100763 https://massbank.eu/MassBank/RecordDisplay?id=PT102460
MS$FOCUSED_ION: PRECURSOR_M/Z 590.4495 1.315 590.0900 7.802 589.9528 1.134 444.0505 2.504