date seems to be the date the record was generated in the Bruker library, not the MassBank record generation date. Each has pros and cons but required is the "Date of the creation or last modification of the MassBank record". The date of acquisition could be included in the COMMENT field (maybe along with the raw file name, so the contributor will recognise the original file if required).
date seems to be the date the record was generated in the Bruker library, not the MassBank record generation date. Each has pros and cons but required is the "Date of the creation or last modification of the MassBank record". The date of acquisition could be included in the COMMENT field (maybe along with the raw file name, so the contributor will recognise the original file if required).