search

MassBank / MassBank2NIST

A converter between MassBank and NIST (and Bruker .library) formats and back
2 stars 2 forks source link

Instrument: full name needed, e.g. Bruker doesn't appear anywhere #8

Closed sneumann closed 10 years ago

schymane commented 10 years ago

To be read from the settings file

sneumann commented 10 years ago

Which should have priority ? .library or the settings ? If the former, this will require single-instrument .library files.

uchem-massbank commented 10 years ago

Won’t the latter (overwriting with the settings) require single-instrument library files? I find the decision to overwrite this with the settings file a bit dangerous if the library files are indeed mixed. But, if they are mixed, other settings will also presumably be wrong? Are there consistent entries in the *.library file that can be converted to the correct instrument type in MassBank?

From: sneumann [mailto:notifications@github.com] Sent: Mittwoch, 19. November 2014 09:18 To: MassBank/MassBank2NIST Subject: Re: [MassBank2NIST] Instrument: full name needed, e.g. Bruker doesn't appear anywhere (#8)

Which should have priority ? .library or the settings ? If the former, this will require single-instrument .library files.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/MassBank/MassBank2NIST/issues/8#issuecomment-63605760.