Open NullOrNaN opened 8 years ago
Frankly, you should have one on each repo as it's a different project/code base.
Also, I'm unsure why you closed this instead of simply replying, @ulumulu1510. as all that it was meant to do was to add you a license file for this repo. If you don't wish to have one so be it, but I strong encourage you to add one to all the repos instead of having it on just one of them.
Thought it was MIT according to DBO?
First of all, I'm terribly sorry for my first answer (as why I delted it). You are indeed correct, we are missing a license file in the repo. @MatthewM
@RoboMWM, your assumption is correct.
I see your issue now and again, I am sorry for the inconvenience.
I will go ahead and foreward the issue to Cayorion, as Licenses are chosen by him.
@ulumulu1510 thank you. I was a bit confused as to why Factions license was linked to instead of one in this repo. If I had missed it I'd have been like "oh, my bad!".
Do keep us posted on the progress of this please :)
We are not going to pull a pull request where you add a license file. That seems very insecure and like bad practice. I might add the license myself soon. For now we have more important things to focus on.
@oloflarsson you should always check all PRs and their content before adding them. I'm not suggesting you blindly add it.. I was suggesting that a license be added to this repo.
As I mentioned in one of the recently closed PR's, this repo seems to be missing a license file.
According to @MarkehMe it should be LGPLv3, is this correct? I want to ensure that I send you a PR for the correct license file.