MasterInQuestion
commented
1 week ago JavaScript in SVG: https://old.reddit.com/r/uBlockOrigin/comments/1f84tc5/svg_image_seemingly_able_to_circumvent_javascript/?sort=old#lley39v https://www.bpb.de/system/files/datei/SOZ_04_02_detail_0.svg . Misuse & Quintessential Overengineering.
Such "image"... What difference is it of between a fully-fledged web app? Image that requires an interaction engine to properly render?.. Interactive-Image in HTML... Who invented it?
![[ Test Embedding ]](https://github.com/MasterInQuestion/attach/raw/main/MasterInQuestion/Markup/2/JS.svg)
Note: GitHub's CSP (Content Security Policy) disallowed the script's execution. See also: https://github.com/MasterInQuestion/attach/commit/80ff86187f5bbe807541b123993bdc77c9bd6cca
The "Counting.png" (pre-rendered "Counting.htm") is so notoriously large (~ 1.33 MiB): [ Did some palette optimization (merge similar colors and limit color space): <&>now ~ 647.17 KiB</&>. [1] ] Why not consider have it converted to SVG?
Did considered, but to no avail. In brief, current SVG definition has broken support for text type contents: Primarily, it's missing support for content of non-fixed (undetermined) size (i.e. no wrapping and overflow handling): which is typically the case for texts. . It also lacks support for many CSS properties: which makes table rendering a bit bothersome.
Of course, vectorizing the PNG is also an option. I'm just not interested to bother. \ \ === Further reading ===
SVG doesn't seem to be well-designed to be used in Plain Text: Cannot be properly parsed without uttering that verbose (and much meaningless) `
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"`...And the very dumbfounding "d" graphic path definition...
See also: https://github.com/MasterInQuestion/talk/discussions/15#discussion-6022492 ("SVG")
[ [1] Did further optimization using WebP: finally ~ 278.18 KiB. More details: https://github.com/MasterInQuestion/attach/commit/401c58fc3a56d265feadda567f02d79de93ff10c#Counting ]