Open vadimkrutovlv opened 8 months ago
For reference, AutoMockable generates syntax that basically looks like this, for the example code provided:
class FacebookLoginRepositoryProtocolMock: FacebookLoginRepositoryProtocol {
var isRegisteredCallsCount = 0
var isRegisteredCalled: Bool {
return isRegisteredCallsCount > 0
}
var isRegistered: Bool {
get async throws {
isRegisteredCallsCount += 1
if let error = isRegisteredThrowableError {
throw error
}
if let isRegisteredClosure = isRegisteredClosure {
return try await isRegisteredClosure()
} else {
return underlyingIsRegistered
}
}
}
var underlyingIsRegistered: Bool!
var isRegisteredThrowableError: Error?
var isRegisteredClosure: (() async throws -> Bool)?
}
The simplest approach would probably be to see if we can replicate this output to get the same functionality, though we could probably leave out the <thing>CallsCount
and <thing>Called
for the purposes of resolving this issue.
This doesn't seem like it'd be too bad, so I'd be happy to take a look at putting up a PR when I get some more time.
@dafurman thanks for you reply, you mean remove propertyCallsCount
completely? Honestly I think propertyCallsCount
is super useful to verify that exact method or property in this case was called expected amount of times, I'd say it's crucial when it comes to performance. So if possible it would be really great to keep at least Count.
@vadimkrutovlv Oh I agree in seeing the value in it!
Because I was talking about the Sourcery equivalent, I just mean that since callcount and called don't currently on properties with Spyable, for the sake of fulfillment of this particular issue, I'd suggest deferring addition of that to a separate issue, just to keep changes smaller and focused on supporting throwable computed properties for now.
I think it'd be easier to track adding <thing>callsCount
and <thing>called
to computed properties in a separate issue.
Oh I see, sorry my bad, I misunderstood you. Yeah it's absolutely fine to track it separately, thank you so much!
Currently I'm super happy to use this macro, it allows me to drop third party dependency an the fact that mocks are generated in the main target allows me to reduce a boilerplate code for view model mocks for swift ui previews.
However I already run multiple times in a situation when I could use a computed property instead of method but unfortunately I can't specify ThrowableError as for the methods. Consider following code.
I would really love to have something like this:
As for now the only code macro generates is this:
Would it be possible to implement something like I mentioned above? Sorry I didn't check source code that much and maybe there are some limitations about which I don't know.
Alternatively I still can use a method which is not a big deal, but I like to keep my codebase clean as much as possible.