Closed wladerer closed 2 years ago
Hi @wladerer, thanks a lot for the contribution. I think that the implementation is fine, but I was wondering if it would be good to also have an ecp
option in addition to the ecp_atom
, similarly to what is there for basis
and basis_atom
. What do you think? If you think it would make sense can you also add that option?
In my experience, it is unusual to apply an effective core potential to all atoms. For instance, this is useful for very heavy atoms, but not terribly useful for hydrogen. If you were to be working with any organic molecules/ligands, then adding an ecp to each hydrogen might be frustrating.
But my experience has been molecular DFT with lanthanides, so I am quite biased in my implementation.
Thanks for clarifying this. We can leave things as they are and add the ecf
option if needed at a later stage. I will merge and add the tests, since we will need to run them with TM7.5 and 7.6 for the integration tests.
Attached are the yaml file and the python script for running the test case. I had to change the file extensions, sorry about that.
parameters.txt test_script.txt