Open kohlhase opened 9 years ago
Can we not simply make them use relative paths? (Can latex handle those?)
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015, 17:52 Michael Kohlhase notifications@github.com wrote:
There is a general problem with localpaths.tex in docker-based installations of lmh. When I generate them with lmh in docker, they contain /path/to/.... which makes it impossible to run simple pdflatex on them.
The only way I see to get around that seems to create /path/to and then link ~/localmh into that, if I want to use regular pdflatex. Am I overlooking something?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/KWARC/localmh_docker/issues/7.
I do not remember correctly, but there was a good reason we changed to absolute paths back then. I will try to remember.
There is a general problem with
localpaths.tex
in docker-based installations oflmh
. When I generate them withlmh
in docker, they contain/path/to/....
which makes it impossible to run simplepdflatex
on them.The only way I see to get around that seems to create
/path/to
and then link~/localmh
into that, if I want to use regularpdflatex
. Am I overlooking something?