I just looked over the NTCIR paper draft, and I see that in Figure 1, line three there is an instance of "math1", which has not been replaced by a formula. @cprodescu
Actually there is another thing that REALLY needs to be fixed: When I compare the result with the paper, then I see that every line in Figure1 is a different snippet. That is not something I had realized by my first look at the result. Can we mark the beginning and end of each snippet by a (blue) [...]? That would make things much much clearer (to me).
It would also be good (eventually) to have a link to each snippet in the original separately.
The first two things need to be fixed for the NTCIR paper, i.e. until Wednesday!
I like the ellipsis operators, but I think they should not be , I commented inline in the commit (do you get notified about this?) Then I would not need to comment here.
I just looked over the NTCIR paper draft, and I see that in Figure 1, line three there is an instance of "math1", which has not been replaced by a formula. @cprodescu
Actually there is another thing that REALLY needs to be fixed: When I compare the result with the paper, then I see that every line in Figure1 is a different snippet. That is not something I had realized by my first look at the result. Can we mark the beginning and end of each snippet by a (blue) [...]? That would make things much much clearer (to me).
It would also be good (eventually) to have a link to each snippet in the original separately.
The first two things need to be fixed for the NTCIR paper, i.e. until Wednesday!