search

MathewWi / cfg-loader

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/cfg-loader
0 stars 0 forks source link

Remove old IOS 222 and 223 YAL #115

Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Please, could you remove the support for old IOS 222 and 223 YAL?
We don't need these IOS
Thanks

Original issue reported on code.google.com by torbelli...@gmail.com on 22 Jan 2011 at 9:25

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
. . .why does this bother you to the point where you'd need a developer to take 
his time to REMOVE them?

Original comment by j.kurisa...@gmail.com on 4 Feb 2011 at 10:23

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Because by error you can choose these cIOS that no longer are installed and it 
gives an error. 
I do not believe that a Developer of this project needs long time to remove 
them. They are good Developers!!!.

Original comment by torbelli...@gmail.com on 6 Feb 2011 at 3:21

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Agreed. Remove 222 YAL and 223 YAL. I searched for hours and couldnt even find 
info on the damn IOS's. Anyhow, don't remove them, REPLACE them with SLOT 244 
and SLOT 243, that way when using Waninkoko Rev21 OR D2X v6, we have a slot for 
all bases that USB Loaders and NAND Emulators use! 
243[36],244[37],245[38],246[53],247[55],248[56],249[57],250[58]. We can build 
from base 60,61,70, & 80 also but I haven't found a purpose. My Current setup i 
have Hermes' cIOSx 5.1 222[38],223[37],224[57] and D2X v6.0 Final 
245[38],246[53],247[55],248[56],249[57],250[58]. I DID originally set v68d to 
"ios = 248" to use my [56] base but the loading was slow and it would even load 
covers, kept glitching. Best setup is to use "ios = 250" to use a [58] base and 
then individually set each game to reload 248[56] or 249[57]. Doing it this 
way, I have excellent speed and no glitches. Was also getting lag and glitching 
using "ios = 249" with a [57] base. The [58] base is definately the right IOS 
choice for USB Loader Frontends (like CFG & GX)

Original comment by RussianB...@gmail.com on 11 Jun 2011 at 8:41

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by ogg...@gmail.com on 3 Jul 2011 at 9:15