the log in DopIosModReport.csv is wrong

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Start DOP-IOS MOD v11
2. Select "Scan the Wii's internals"
3. check the log in the SD root (DopIosModReport.csv)

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?

I would expect the log to correspond with the output I get on
the screen, but it doesn't. The log lacks the FakeSign column, and has all
the other columns shifted by one towards the left (so that it appears that
the missing columns is the USB 2.0 support).

Original issue reported on code.google.com by gianluca...@gmail.com on 25 Jan 2010 at 12:51

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Woops. I'll have it fixed for v12.

Original comment by Lunatik.CN@gmail.com on 25 Jan 2010 at 1:32

Changed state: Accepted

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Issue 28 has been merged into this issue.

Original comment by Lunatik.CN@gmail.com on 28 Jan 2010 at 6:03

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Fixed in v11.1

Original comment by Lunatik.CN@gmail.com on 29 Jan 2010 at 4:25

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by Lunatik.CN@gmail.com on 29 Jan 2010 at 4:26

Changed state: Fixed

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Thanks for the update Lunatik! :)

Original comment by Madridi4...@gmail.com on 29 Jan 2010 at 4:50

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

No Prob ;)

Original comment by Lunatik.CN@gmail.com on 29 Jan 2010 at 5:16

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

so i ran syscheck within from the program again and compared it to the original 
syscheck program. All reports are the same except for the fakesign column (I 
assume 
the column called Trucha bug is the same as fake sign?)

Below are two sets of data, the first is the original syscheck and the second 
is the 
one in dop-ios

IOS (revision)  Trucha Bug
IOS0 (rev 3094) Enabled
IOS9 (rev 521)  Disabled
IOS11 (rev 10)  Enabled
IOS12 (rev 6)   Enabled
IOS13 (rev 10)  Enabled
IOS14 (rev 263) Disabled
IOS15 (rev 257) Enabled
IOS17 (rev 512) Enabled
IOS20 (rev 12)  Enabled
IOS21 (rev 514) Enabled
IOS22 (rev 780) Disabled
IOS28 (rev 1293)    Disabled
IOS30 (rev 1040)    Enabled
IOS31 (rev 1040)    Enabled
IOS33 (rev 1040)    Enabled
IOS34 (rev 1039)    Enabled
IOS35 (rev 1040)    Enabled
IOS36 (rev 3094)    Enabled
IOS37 (rev 3612)    Disabled
IOS38 (rev 3610)    Enabled
IOS53 (rev 5149)    Disabled
IOS55 (rev 5149)    Disabled
IOS60 (rev 6174)    Enabled
IOS61 (rev 4890)    Disabled
IOS202 (rev 2)  Disabled
IOS222 (rev 4)  Enabled
IOS223 (rev 4)  Enabled
IOS249 (rev 17) Disabled
IOS250 (rev 65535)  Disabled
IOS254 (rev 3)  Disabled
IOS255 (rev 31337)  Enabled

------------------------

IOS Version  FakeSign
255 (r31337)     Disabled
250 (r65535)     Enabled
249 (r17)    Enabled
223 (r4)     Enabled
222 (r4)     Enabled
202 (r2)     Enabled
61 (r4890)   Disabled
60 (r6174)   Enabled
55 (r5149)   Disabled
53 (r5149)   Disabled
38 (r3610)   Enabled
37 (r3612)   Disabled
36 (r3094)   Enabled
35 (r1040)   Enabled
34 (r1039)   Enabled
33 (r1040)   Enabled
31 (r1040)   Enabled
30 (r1040)   Enabled
28 (r1293)   Disabled
22 (r780)    Disabled
21 (r514)    Disabled
20 (r12)     Disabled
17 (r512)    Disabled
15 (r257)    Disabled
15 (r257)    Disabled
14 (r263)    Disabled
13 (r10)     Disabled
12 (r6)  Disabled

Original comment by Madridi4...@gmail.com on 29 Jan 2010 at 5:48

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Correct. The Trucha bug is what allows Fake Signing. It is the same thing. The 
screen
and the csv file displays the same exact thing now.

Original comment by Lunatik.CN@gmail.com on 29 Jan 2010 at 6:17

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Well, what I'm trying to say is that it doesnt show the exact same thing.

check ios249, ios202, or ios12 for example..

one of them it says enabled while it says disabled in the other..

Original comment by Madridi4...@gmail.com on 29 Jan 2010 at 6:29

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

That is because I fixed it in 11.1 ;) The top one is not correct due to the 
logic I
originally had.

Original comment by Lunatik.CN@gmail.com on 29 Jan 2010 at 7:06

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

I think you misunderstood me Lunatik.

The first one is from a program called syscheck by erikspyder found in the 
following 
link
http://gbatemp.net/index.php?showtopic=205741

The second data set is the output from 11.1

All columns are the same except for the fakesign column
So which program has it wrong?

Original comment by Madridi4...@gmail.com on 29 Jan 2010 at 7:21

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

More than likely ours is correct. The way we test for FakeSigning is by sending 
an
invalid TMD file to ES_AddTitleStart. If it succeeds then we know it is has the
trucha bug. Without being able to see the source code for SysCheck I can't tell 
you
how he is testing.

Original comment by Lunatik.CN@gmail.com on 29 Jan 2010 at 9:00

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Yeah I know, I just wanted to bring it to your attention. 
It did seem weird that ios249 didnt have fake signing in the original syscheck 
program.

Thanks :)

Original comment by Madridi4...@gmail.com on 29 Jan 2010 at 9:07

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Sorry been handling multiple things and doing real work all at the same time ;)

Original comment by Lunatik.CN@gmail.com on 29 Jan 2010 at 9:43

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

It's alright dude thanks for all your work. It's greatly appreciated :)

Original comment by Madridi4...@gmail.com on 29 Jan 2010 at 9:47

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

No Prob. But yeah it is weird that the cios would show disabled which tells me
however he is doing the fakesign checking is not valid.

Original comment by Lunatik.CN@gmail.com on 29 Jan 2010 at 10:27

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Issue 34 has been merged into this issue.

Original comment by Lunatik.CN@gmail.com on 2 Feb 2010 at 1:21

MathewWi / dop-iosmod

the log in DopIosModReport.csv is wrong #24