signcheck vs syscheck vs dop-ios signcheck

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I ran syscheck, signcheck, and signcheck within dop-ios, and compared 
results. Here is what i found:

- dop-ios signcheck checked ios15 twice for some reason (probably a bug 
somewhere), otherwise signcheck reports the same as the one in dop-ios so 
i wont be mentioning it anymore

- syscheck seems the most accurate one of them, it reports 5 criterias. 
Even though dop-ios signcheck does have 5 criterias, but only 4 columns of 
output are produced (it says nothing under usb 2.0 ios tree)

- I think there is a bug where the outputs are shifted. I think fakesign 
column is the empty one, and all columns are shifted to the left Meaning 
whatever is reported under that is supposed to be the output ES_identify, 
whatever is reported for ES_Identify is suppoed to be for flash access, 
and so on..

That's about it. I hope it contributes to something. I hope you guys try 
syscheck and try to see the differences

Original issue reported on code.google.com by Madridi4...@gmail.com on 28 Jan 2010 at 5:58

• Merged into: #24

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Dupe of Issue 24

Original comment by Lunatik.CN@gmail.com on 28 Jan 2010 at 6:03

• Changed state: Duplicate

[GoogleCodeExporter]

woops, yeah you're right. Thanks for looking into it.

However there is still the issue of IOS15 being scanned twice for some reason..

Original comment by Madridi4...@gmail.com on 28 Jan 2010 at 6:08

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I already know about it. It'll be fixed in v12. ;)

Original comment by Lunatik.CN@gmail.com on 28 Jan 2010 at 6:11

[GoogleCodeExporter]

csv is fixed in v11.1. Missing and Duplicate IOSes will be fixed in v12

Original comment by Lunatik.CN@gmail.com on 29 Jan 2010 at 4:26