Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
OK not to be nit picky, but it Says "Normally Used for Piracy" not "Is Used for
Piracy". There is a big difference in the text.
Moving on.
IOS 202 is not an offically supported by Nintendo so it is considered by
default an
IOS used for Piracy. I'm in debate on what to actually put here because in 1
hand the
only way to get IOS202 is by using a Custom IOS which usually promotes piracy.
But in
the other hand I know that the Custom IOS is needed for USB 2.0 support. I'll
think
about this one a little bit more.
IOS 249 - I'll update the description. But it is hard to say to say what it is
fully
used for since Nintendo has tried to stub it so many times. I will add a
comment that
says it is normally in use by BootMii IOS. However most of what I have to go by
for
IOS249 is from here. http://wiibrew.org/wiki/IOS254
Thanks, for the info on IOS13. There is nothing on WiiBrew on it, however after
checking out the TMD for the "All" Regions for News and Weather I do see it is
used
by that IOS. The Actual "Region" Titles are using IOS31.
Original comment by Lunatik.CN@gmail.com
on 9 Feb 2010 at 10:11
Original comment by Lunatik.CN@gmail.com
on 9 Feb 2010 at 10:12
Original comment by Lunatik.CN@gmail.com
on 9 Feb 2010 at 10:13
OK Here is what I decided. Let me know what you think.
for IOS202
description="Commonly used by a Custom IOS to enable USB 2.0 support for
MPlayer CE.
This IOS is not offically supported by Nintendo"
for IOS249
description="Commonly used for BootMii IOS. All offical Nintendo versions are
stubs."
Original comment by Lunatik.CN@gmail.com
on 9 Feb 2010 at 10:30
It's *254*, not IOS249. IOS249 -IS- used for piracy. Assuming you mean IOS254,
the
description describes it accurately.
IOS202's description is perfect.
Thanks for the quick bug report response. I'll look forward to Beta2!
Original comment by wolst...@gmail.com
on 9 Feb 2010 at 10:38
Whoops your right. That is what I meant ;) I actually updated it correctly in
my xml
file ;)
Original comment by Lunatik.CN@gmail.com
on 9 Feb 2010 at 11:23
Fixed and Released into Beta2 ;)
Original comment by Lunatik.CN@gmail.com
on 10 Feb 2010 at 12:33
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
wolst...@gmail.com
on 9 Feb 2010 at 9:00