nandcheck improvement (not a real "bug")

[GoogleCodeExporter]

What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. using nandcheck to check an emulated nand that has either a custom theme or 
priiloader installed

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?

expect no errors, but instead we see:

[Error] Size of Content 8 from title 00000001-00000002 is wrong!
[Error] Size is : 568368 bytes
[Error] Size should be: 3867904 bytes 

What revision are you using?
NANDCheckv0.1b

Please provide any additional information below.
This isn't really a bug since I'm sure this app wasn't intended to check nands 
with custom themes or priiloader installed... but a lot of people have emulated 
nands with this stuff installed (especially since support for custom themes and 
priiloader was added to ModMii) and some are reporting false-postive nandcheck 
errors. It would be awesome if nandcheck could detect themes (at a minimum the 
two supported by ModMii) and also detect priiloader in order to avoid flagging 
them as errors.

Great work crediar, props to you my friend.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by xfla...@gmail.com on 3 May 2011 at 8:47

[GoogleCodeExporter]

[deleted comment]

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Sorry for posting this issue twice... I thought I removed the first one before 
posting it again... and I can't seem to figure out how to add labels and set 
status to new or w/e... 

------------
Status:    Invalid
Owner:     ----
Closed:    Today   I_AM_AN_IDIOT
    SET_STATUS_TO_NEW
    ADD_REAL_LABELS

Original comment by xfla...@gmail.com on 3 May 2011 at 8:50

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Detecting a theme install is not really possible.

Original comment by cred...@rypp.net on 4 May 2011 at 1:41

• Changed state: Accepted
• Added labels: Type-Enhancement, OpSys-Windows, Priority-Low, Component-Logic, Usability
• Removed labels: I_AM_AN_IDIOT, SET_STATUS_TO_NEW, ADD_REAL_LABELS

[GoogleCodeExporter]

How about priiloader? if 100000XX.app exists then check that instead of 
000000XX.app... of course u wouldn't be able to check priiloader (000000XX.app) 
at least not without checking for all the different versions of priiloader, so 
it would have to be taken on good faith that priiloader was copied to the 
emunand properly... and I can see why you would want to avoid adding a"blind 
spot" like that to nandcheck, but thought I'd suggest it anyways. Like I said 
earlier, I know this isn't a bug... but perhaps you could have more comments 
when it errors saying that error A could be a result of a custom theme or error 
B could be a result of priiloader being installed to the emunand. Or just add 
those warnings to a read me... or none of the above, its up to you.

Great work on everything.

Btw, OverjoY over at gbatemp is working on a new di module for s/uneek that 
supports wbfs files instead of the current sneek extracted format for games. 
I'm not sure if that interests you, but I thought I'd mention it in case you 
wanted to get in touch with him and collaborate.

Original comment by xfla...@gmail.com on 4 May 2011 at 2:47

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I have try a lot of configuration for start Sneek-di latest version.. but 
nothing...
i have dump my nand (have inside priiloader) with modmii. i have extract with 
nand extractor (paranoyedwii) but nothing blank screen.... (i have install with 
sneek installer). what i can do?? my wii is a 4.3e black.
Please crediar do a uab loader of GC iso! u need to crack dios mios? PLEASE!

Original comment by damoreja...@gmail.com on 24 Oct 2011 at 12:46