Currently the following pact-specification-version-format is used:
"pactSpecificationVersion": "3.0.0"
According to this thread "https://github.com/DiUS/pact-jvm/issues/917", the following format should be used by all Pact libraries:
"pactSpecification": { "version": "3.0.0" }
Is it possible to support the right format?
Background info:
We are currently in the situation that we have a consumer in .NET and a provider in Java which is using the "pact-jvm" library. The provider is not accepting the consumer pact because it uses the wrong "pact-specification-version-format". And according to the linked thread there seems to be an agreement to support only the above format.
Currently the following pact-specification-version-format is used:
"pactSpecificationVersion": "3.0.0"
According to this thread "https://github.com/DiUS/pact-jvm/issues/917", the following format should be used by all Pact libraries:
"pactSpecification": { "version": "3.0.0" }
Is it possible to support the right format?Background info: We are currently in the situation that we have a consumer in .NET and a provider in Java which is using the "pact-jvm" library. The provider is not accepting the consumer pact because it uses the wrong "pact-specification-version-format". And according to the linked thread there seems to be an agreement to support only the above format.