Open MatthewCroughan opened 4 years ago
This PR https://github.com/MatthewCroughan/octobalena/pull/11 is a Change-type: major
due to this issue. If we can have our own /usr/src/octobalena/config.yaml
and combine it with the one that Octoprint is managing at runtime, then we can solve this. Until then, we cannot change the config.yaml without it being a major change.
Regarding plugins, I noted the following in https://github.com/MatthewCroughan/octobalena/pull/10
to get around this for the time being I use PYTHONUSERBASE=/usr/local in the Dockerfile, so that plugins installed by the Dockerfile are stateless and installed in an unmanaged directory.
/data/plugins
should remain a managed directory since then user installed plugins remain, obviously. The only real issue is that we cannot change portions of the config.yml for a user after they've installed Octobalena, so any major changes will not propagate to them.
I think my PR #41 might have resolved some of the symptoms described here by updating the --basedir
to be a path under /data
.
I can't fully articulate the issue at hand right now, but I'm making a note of it for when I get around to it. Simply put, the fact that Octoprint has a volume that links to
/data
is problematic, since the included plugins are also in this directory, which means that the state of these plugins and absolutely everything else cannot be modified by updating the Dockerfile. I should fix this.