Review and suggest improvements to the plone.org Information Architecture

MatthewWilkes / google-highly-open-participation-plone

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/google-highly-open-participation-plone

0 stars 0 forks source link

Review and suggest improvements to the plone.org Information Architecture #11

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

plone.org is a large (and old!) site. It has grown organically over a long 
time. In parts, the 
placement of content and information may be sub-optimal.

The task: Produce a report analysing the information architecture of the 
plone.org website with 
clear recommendations for how the site could be improved.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by optil...@gmail.com on 19 Nov 2007 at 10:59

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by l...@gmail.com on 27 Nov 2007 at 7:03

Changed state: Open
Added labels: 2-day

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by l...@gmail.com on 28 Nov 2007 at 11:23

Added labels: Documentation
Removed labels: Documenation

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

I claim this task.

Do you mean the whole plone website, or just the documentation?

Cheers,

David

Original comment by davethew...@gmail.com on 10 Dec 2007 at 12:03

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

The whole website.

We look forward to your submission in two days' time.

Original comment by optil...@gmail.com on 10 Dec 2007 at 1:04

Changed state: Claimed

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

I've attached a partial draft of the review here. I know it's not much yet, but 
I'd 
just like to know if I am headed in the right direction. Thanks!

Original comment by davethew...@gmail.com on 11 Dec 2007 at 7:19

Attachments:

[plone.org information architecture review](https://storage.googleapis.com/google-code-attachments/google-highly-open-participation-plone/issue-11/comment-5/plone.org information architecture review)

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

I am finding quite a few "stub" articles, that just include a link to another 
page. 
Should I list them, or are they already being worked on by the issue 
titled "Identify and fix errors in plone.org's error log"?

Original comment by davethew...@gmail.com on 11 Dec 2007 at 10:12

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

I am finding quite a few "stub" articles, that just include a link to another 
page. 
Should I list them, or are they already being worked on by the issue 
titled "Identify and fix errors in plone.org's error log"?

Original comment by davethew...@gmail.com on 11 Dec 2007 at 10:12

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

I am finding quite a few "stub" articles, that just include a link to another 
page. 
Should I list them, or are they already being worked on by the issue 
titled "Identify and fix errors in plone.org's error log"?

Original comment by davethew...@gmail.com on 11 Dec 2007 at 10:13

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Sorry about the multiple comments, my web browser is not working properly. :(

Original comment by davethew...@gmail.com on 11 Dec 2007 at 10:15

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Here is my submission. Please review and suggest any improvements if necessary.

Thanks,

David

Original comment by davethew...@gmail.com on 12 Dec 2007 at 3:10

Attachments:

[plone.org information architecture review](https://storage.googleapis.com/google-code-attachments/google-highly-open-participation-plone/issue-11/comment-10/plone.org information architecture review)

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

The report looks good, but the recommendations aren't very clear.  Could you 
produce
a simple layout of how it should be structured.  

eg:

Plone.org
            Section
                        Subsection
                        Subsection
                        Subsection
                        Subsection
            Section
                        Subsection
                        Subsection
                        Subsection
                        Subsection
            Section
                        Subsection
                        Subsection
                        Subsection
                        Subsection

Original comment by mw4...@googlemail.com on 13 Dec 2007 at 12:34

Added labels: claimedby-davethewebb

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

I wouldn't recommend a huge restructure of the site, so there's not much in 
terms 
of the major structure to be done. As most of my recommendations are fairly 
minor, 
they don't show up on the scale of the whole site structure. But I've attached 
the 
document with a revised Site structure added below my report for you to see 
anyway.

I have written my recommendations throughout the document in the format "** 
(recommendation) **" so that they are easy to find. In this revision I have 
also 
listed each of them at the bottom of the report.

Hope this helps!

Original comment by davethew...@gmail.com on 13 Dec 2007 at 10:49

Attachments:

[plone.org information architecture review updated](https://storage.googleapis.com/google-code-attachments/google-highly-open-participation-plone/issue-11/comment-12/plone.org information architecture review updated)

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Perfect.  Thanks very much, I'll close this task.

Original comment by mw4...@googlemail.com on 13 Dec 2007 at 3:55

Changed state: Closed