Closed debona closed 10 years ago
Thank you very much ;)
I will try to fix #112 before merging this. If it's too long, I'll merge as it is.
v0.6.2
). I will uncomment the tests you provided, unless you prefer to do it yourself.Even though I really like without
as a CLI switch, I'm wondering if ignore
would not be a more proper switch in a config file. What do you think?
Added some commits in branch ignore-features
, simply about uniforming error handling and improving messages.
Waiting for your feedback on the switch name before merging and publishing v0.6.2 :)
--ignore
switch sounds a little bit more GNUish and it would be clearer in a config file. Even if I like --without
too. ^^
You just have to git revert 8beb67d
to enable the integration tests.
I let you handle merges to deliver that in v0.6.2.
Merged in 51faa9c8593bf7e47cc62a2a79b75d0e46ec8d49, published since 0.6.2-alpha.2
. Thanks! :)
Released and acknowledged, thanks again! :)
Allow to ignore features of a suite test on the fly by providing
{ "without" : [1, 4] }
in config.